Property Boundaries – Overhanging Trees

by Macrossan & Amiet

December 13, 2022

Subscribe

My husband and I recently bought a house with two beautiful trees in the backyard.  One is a lychee tree, which our neighbours warned the fruit bats often get to enjoy before we will even see them.  The other is a mango tree.  The mango tree has grown at an odd lean, meaning its branches borders onto our neighbour’s yard.  While not a problem now, I was immediately concerned it could cause problems in the future, should the fruit fall into their yard.

Issues relating to overhanging trees are addressed in The Neighbourhood Disputes (Dividing Fences and Trees) Act 2011 (the “Act”).  While it is encouraged that neighbours attempt to sort the matter between themselves initially, it is important to understand exactly what constitutes land affected by a tree, who is responsible, and what remedies are available when the neighbours cannot come to an agreement.

When is land “affected” by a tree?

Just because a few leaves from the neighbours tree may blow into your yard on occasion does not mean your land is affected by the tree.  In order to be covered by the Act, one of the following must apply:-

  1. Branches from the tree overhang the land; or
  2. The tree has caused, is causing or is likely within the next 12 months to cause:–
    1. Serious injury to a person on the land;
    2. Serious damage to the land or any property on the land; or
    3. Substantial, ongoing and unreasonable interference with the neighbour’s use and enjoyment of the land.

An example of unreasonable interference is if large seeds, pines, or fruit are constantly littering your yard, requiring you to go out of your way to provide regular cleanup of the litter.

Who is the “Tree-Keeper”?

For standard residential lots, the owner of the land which the tree is on is the Tree-Keeper.  If it is part of a body corporate common area, then the body corporate is the Tree-Keeper.  In essence, whoever is the registered or legal owner of the land is recognized as the Tree-Keeper.  If the tree is right on the boundary between the two neighbouring lots and there is a disagreement about who is responsible, it may be worth contacting a surveyor to determine who the responsible owner is.

Responsibilities of a Tree-Keeper

The Tree-Keeper is responsible for maintaining the relevant tree, which includes cutting and removing branches of the tree which overhang the neighbour’s land.  They must also ensure the tree does not affect the neighbours land by causing injury, damage or unreasonable interference per the above.  A failure by the Tree-Keeper to attend to this does not in and of itself result in an immediate breach of the Act but can lead to the neighbour taking action if the problem is raised and subsequently not addressed.

Rights of the Affected Neighbour

It is encouraged that neighbours try to resolve the issue informally between themselves to maintain a friendly and peaceful relationship.  However, if this is not achievable, then there are a few different avenues of recourse depending on the issue.

If the issue relates to overhanging branches, then the affected neighbour has two options:-

  1. Common Law Right Of Abatement: allows the neighbour to cut off the branches or roots that have extended onto their property, as long as the health of the tree is not damaged. The neighbour may or may not return the chopped branches to the Tree-Keeper.  It is important to check with your local council or tree expert when getting a quote to check if any approvals are needed.
  2. Written Notice to Remove Overhanging Branches: following the formal process as set out in the Act.  The formal process may only be followed if the branches are at least 50cm from the shared boundary and the branch is 2.5m or less above the ground.  Notice may be given by the affected neighbour to the Tree-Keeper to remove the overhanging branches, which must specify a timeframe of at least 30 days for this to be done.  The Tree-Keeper is required to respond within this timeframe confirming if they will arrange for someone to do the work, when it is scheduled to be done, and a quote for the cost.  If this is not complied with, the affected neighbour may remove the branches themselves.  The removed branches may or may not be returned to the Tree-Keeper and the neighbour can claim up to $300.00 in expenses from the Tree-Keeper.

If the above options do not resolve the issue or the issue is not caused by overhanging branches as defined above, the neighbour may make an application to the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal (“QCAT”) to try and have the matter resolved.  If the person occupying the property is not the owner (i.e., you are renting the affected property), you may only make a QCAT application if the registered owner of the land refuses to do so.

Ideally the situation should be resolved before it gets to this point, though we understand that this is not always the case.  In the event that you require advice regarding your rights relating to overhanging trees, please contact our office today to book an appointment.

 

share this article

About the author

Macrossan & Amiet

Macrossan & Amiet Solicitors is one of Queensland’s oldest law firms. It has been serving the people of Mackay and the surrounding districts since the late 19th Century, providing quality legal services to all of its clients.

About Macrossan & Amiet Solicitors

For over 100 years, Macrossan & Amiet Solicitors has been a leading local law firm in Mackay, with offices in Proserpine and Cannonvale servicing the Whitsundays region. Our experienced solicitors provide professional legal services to individuals, families and businesses across regional Queensland.

Whether you need representation in court, assistance buying or selling property, or advice on protecting your assets, our Mackay lawyers are committed to achieving the best possible outcome for you.

More Articles from Macrossan & Amiet Solicitors

News and Insights
July 1, 2026

Macrossan & Amiet congratulates Dyane Norton on promotion to Senior Associate

We are delighted to announce that Dyane Norton will be promoted to the position of Senior Associate at Macrossan & Amiet, effective 1 July 2026.

Read Article
June 16, 2026

Quality Business Awards — Recognising Excellence and Trust

Our Criminal Law and Personal Injury teams receive Quality Business Awards recognition, celebrating exceptional service, professionalism, and commitment to client outcomes.

Read Article
June 16, 2026

AML/CTF Reforms Are Coming: What Our Clients Need to Know

Australia’s AML/CTF reforms introduce new obligations for lawyers and other professionals from 1 July 2026, requiring client verification, due diligence and transaction scrutiny to prevent money laundering and terrorism financing risks.

Read Article
June 15, 2026

Leaving Violence Program

The Leaving Violence Program provides financial assistance and support for eligible victim-survivors leaving intimate partner violence relationships, helping them rebuild safely.

Read Article

Select a location to see it's reviews