Subscribe
The Family Law Act 1975 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) contains several presumptions regarding parentage which can result in the wrong person being “assumed” to be the Father of a child.
What happens if a Father becomes aware later, that he is not in fact the Father of a child, and what ramification (if any) are there for the Mother.
Under the Act if a child is born to a married woman the child is presumed to be the child of the Husband and the Wife. Similarly, if a child is born while the mother is in a defacto relationship, the child is presumed to be the child of the defacto partners.
Even in circumstances where the couple (either married or defacto) have separated, re-established the relationship, and separated again, the child is presumed to be a child of the parties to the relationship.
In circumstances where parentage is in question, the Court can order that parentage testing be carried out, either by consent, on application or on its own initiative.
Parenting arrangements and issues concerning child support can be affected if the parentage testing determines that the person who was presumed the Father actually was not.
Parenting Arrangements
If the Father has a well-established relationship with the child by the time it is determined that he is not the Father, a change in the parenting arrangements could have a detrimental effect on the child and may not be in the child’s best interest.
Under the Act, the court has the power to consider the relationship of significant others with the child when determining what is in the child’s best interests. It may be the case that it is in the child’s best interests to continue its relationship with the Father as it was before. In such circumstances it would be unlikely that the court would entertain an argument from the Mother that the Father was not the “biological parent” and therefore should not have any time with the child.
Child Support
If a father has been supporting a child via child support payments and parentage testing determines that he is not the Father of that child, an application can be made to the court to have the payments made by the Father returned.
For the court to be satisfied that this is an appropriate course of action, it must accept that the Mother knew or ought to have known that the “Father” was not the Father of the child at the time of seeking the Child Support payments.
Our advice in this regard is always – if in doubt find it out. If you require advice, contact one of our experienced Family Lawyers today.

About the author
Samantha Sticklan
Director
LLB, Acc. Spec (Fam. Law), Accredited Mediator NMAS, BA(Journ)
Samantha Sticklan commenced with Macrossan & Amiet in February 2018. Samantha grew up in Northern NSW, relocating to Brisbane to attend boarding school and later obtaining her law degree at Griffith University.
In 2004 Samantha relocated to Mackay to take up employment as an Articled Clerk. Samantha was previously employed by another local practice for 14 years, during which time she was successful in obtaining recognition as an Accredited Family Law Specialist by the Qld Law Society.
Samantha is a mother and wife, and when not working keeps her stress levels at bay by taking part in a variety of physical pursuits.
Samantha is an active member of the Mackay Community, currently volunteering with Artspace Mackay Foundation, the Mackay Community Legal Centre and the BMA Mackay Marina Run.
About Macrossan & Amiet Solicitors
For over 100 years, Macrossan & Amiet Solicitors has been a leading local law firm in Mackay, with offices in Proserpine and Cannonvale servicing the Whitsundays region. Our experienced solicitors provide professional legal services to individuals, families and businesses across regional Queensland.
Whether you need representation in court, assistance buying or selling property, or advice on protecting your assets, our Mackay lawyers are committed to achieving the best possible outcome for you.
More Articles from Macrossan & Amiet Solicitors
News and Insights
Macrossan & Amiet congratulates Dyane Norton on promotion to Senior Associate
We are delighted to announce that Dyane Norton will be promoted to the position of Senior Associate at Macrossan & Amiet, effective 1 July 2026.

Quality Business Awards — Recognising Excellence and Trust
Our Criminal Law and Personal Injury teams receive Quality Business Awards recognition, celebrating exceptional service, professionalism, and commitment to client outcomes.

AML/CTF Reforms Are Coming: What Our Clients Need to Know
Australia’s AML/CTF reforms introduce new obligations for lawyers and other professionals from 1 July 2026, requiring client verification, due diligence and transaction scrutiny to prevent money laundering and terrorism financing risks.

Leaving Violence Program
The Leaving Violence Program provides financial assistance and support for eligible victim-survivors leaving intimate partner violence relationships, helping them rebuild safely.